Hi Goran, We use your idea about "previous" and "post" states of the system for every change at the moment that was done. Also,the possibility of do redo and undo of every kind of change.
Then, we track changes from the system announcements instead of monticello packages and we relate every kind of change with its correspondent ring object. Another difference could be the change hierarchy. On 22 November 2012 18:16, Göran Krampe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > > On 11/22/2012 05:10 PM, Ezequiel Lamonica wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> We are working on a New Change System >> <http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~**EzequielLamonica/**NewChangeSystem/<http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~EzequielLamonica/NewChangeSystem/> >> >. >> >> In this link you can see the project. >> > > I should of course look at the code but could you outline > differences/similarities to my/our work on Deltas? > > Then I might be able to give some thoughtful feedback - and yes, I will > look at the code too but it is always interesting to hear "intentions" too. > :) > > regards, Göran > >
