On 05 Dec 2012, at 11:05, Henrik Sperre Johansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> If the same holds true for the % of objects that are methods, you would > probably remove around 90% depending on usage pattern during that particular > week. Of course, just because there are no users doesn't mean that a method should be removed. But there is just too much cruft on Object, SequenceableCollection, String, Integer, .. that does not belong there. At least many of these less general methods should be packages as extensions. I am also sure that by 'using the image for a week', Camillo also meant running all tests, as well as building and running tests for major Pharo clients (@Stephan). Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill
