On 14 December 2012 12:55, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > but the build is broken. > Unless you forced the load (two times) for build, you are not using my merge > yet :) > ah.. ok then this discrepancy introduced even before
> On Dec 14, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14 December 2012 09:35, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> If I download the latest VM and image the same way as our CI jobs on Linux: >>> wget --quiet -qO - http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/ci/ciPharo20NBCog.sh | bash >>> then the VM is broken (it opens only black or white widnow). The image works >>> well with different VM version but with the VM downloaded by this scipt not. >>> It breaks some CI jobs and when I tried to find why the main Pharo 2.0 job >>> is working and others not when they use the same script, I found out that >>> they had build limited to "linux64". My local linux system is 64bit too. >>> >>> So I tried to restict "Pharo Kernel 2.0 support" job to "linux" but it look >>> broken even in this configuraton. So please can you check the VM on a 32-bit >>> system? >>> >> >> same story here.. >> it opens blank black window and period. Looks like a merge done by >> Esteban didn't vent well :( >> >> sig@sig-VirtualBox:~/vm$ uname -a >> Linux sig-VirtualBox 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
