On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Pavel Krivanek
<[email protected]> wrote:
> what is the reason for integration of KeyChain/UsersManager to the image? It
> created the next kernel dependency. Should it replace Author? Should it be
> in the Pharo Kernel? And why there was no mention about it in this mailing
> list before? ;-)

I'm not sure what is KeyChain, but the name sounds familiar and makes
the package very important as it might solve a critical problem:

- how do you store Monticello/webservices/any application's passwords safely?

To me KeyChain should provide an API to store and access any kind of
credentials. This API could then delegate to the O.S. one.

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm."
Winston Churchill

Reply via email to