Is there a list of the pitfalls of morphic somewhere ?
________________________________ From: Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, 23 December 2012, 17:19 Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] A contorted way of making things work :) >>> Yeah, blame and flame everyone who doesn't write code the way you do... >>> But before you do that, tell me what's wrong with that assignment. >> >> why do I always have the impression you're at extinction when I read >> an email from you? I know I can be very annoying as well :D but you > > If I understand correctly what you're trying to say, then the reason why I > don't write mails here more often is because it's pointless. > >> should consider a friendlier tone ;) > > Do you think my question would have been answered if I were using a > friendlier tone? I doubt it. > Do you think the mail I was replying to was friendlier than mine? I doubt it. Levente We do not consider you as a asshole or whatever. I personally always consider what you are writing with interest and you do not need to write it in a blunt way for that. I do not know why you think that sending emails here is pointless but this is not true. We value feedback, questions and remarks of people. My objective is to build an ecosystem where people can make business and invent their future, no more. Now for this exact point, morphic has some dark corners and we should address them one by one and we will. Now if certain invariants would be clear and respected the code would be in general much nicer. Stef
