On 2 January 2013 10:39, Peter Hugosson-Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for hijacking the thread, I just wanted to be sure I understood it > properly. > > So now I think it's a kind of syntactical sugar for a nicer way of writing: > > Array > with: (builder newButtonFor: self action: #onPrestamosClick label: > 'Prestamos' help: '') > with: (builder newButtonFor: self action: #onMaterialesClick label: > 'Materiales' help: '') > with: (builder newButtonFor: self action: #onSociosClick label: 'Socios' > help: '') > > Does that sound like a good explanation?
Yes. frank > -- > Cheers, > Peter > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2013 09:52, Peter Hugosson-Miller <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Guess it's a bit like the ##(some expression here) of VisualAge >> > Smalltalk? >> >> I think so, but I've only seen ##(foo) in GNU Smalltalk, where it's a >> compile-time literal: >> http://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual/gst.html >> >> frank >> >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > Peter. >> > >> > On 2 jan 2013, at 10:27, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Jan 2, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Peter Hugosson-Miller >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I wasn't being ironic, I just didn't know. In my 18 years of Smalltalk >> >>> programming, I've managed to avoid coming across that particular syntax >> >>> before. Is it Pharo-specific? >> >> It was introduced in Squeak quite early (before 2000). >> >> >> >> Marcus
