On 4 January 2013 09:51, Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yes it needs sources (indirectly) to bind method's argument names
>> during code generation.
>
> Sad. So this is currently a showstopper in using NB
> in deployments where one would not like to give the
> sources away.
>
> If we want (commercial) developers to write applications
> in Pharo there should be a fix for that.
>
Yes. I don't like it either. It needs only the arg names (and their order)
and for that, it involves a compiler to parse source and generate AST.
Which can be completely avoided if temp names is stored somewhere
after compilation.

> Thanks
> T.



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply via email to