Hi! Sorry for the late reply.
> how Loom compares with the fixes that andreas added to the default profiler. I am not sure about Andreas' fixes. Loom tells you for each thread running in the VM the amount of CPU it consumes. Some screenshots should be self explaining: http://objectprofile.com/loom-screenshots.html > I do not know if the code is in squeak because this code was licensed under > GPL. Loom is MIT. > But I would like to know if your profiler takes into account the problems > solved by andreas. Any ref about this? > I did not see an announce of Loom (by the way Loom is the name of large oo > memory developed by the original smalltalk team > a while ago). > > http://objectprofile.com/loom-download.html > > I'm know that some people got problem with our profiler and I would like to > see how we > can improve it. We haven't announced Loom because the Pharo version is not yet ready. Although usable, it has a very poor graphical user interface. The first goal is to have Loom replace the standard process browser. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
