well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.? jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > subscribe and you're done, > > the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail > client. > For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is. > > > On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image >> and the discussion should be here as well. > > valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by > NativeBoost automatically via the update mails. > > Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is > essentially > the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that? > >> Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able >> to follow or find... > > invalid point: > well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have > a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum > on http://forum.world.st/ > >> Please close the group since it adds more confusion. > > nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use > it...
