On 2013-01-31, at 03:53, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Camillo Bruni wrote: >> I was just waiting for the google issue tracker to come back to life... >> >> https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7373 >> >> => Slice in Inbox >> >> the major problem I have now, is that wrong categorizations might easily >> spread :P, the sepll-fleu and the space - vi rus, are very common... >> >> > > Can the auto-categorization mark such methods as "auto-categorized" ? So > that later if it doesn't seem quite right, a human can make a better judgment > rather than assuming someone else had already made such a judgment for > some-good-reason. In reality perhaps such re-categorization wouldn't happen > a lot, but "being at least able to" make such judgment increases confidence > in the system, which can be subtly undermined by automated tools (and anyway > I hate throwing away information that is easily available at the time). This > wouldn't need any tool support straight away, but at least the data is > captured for later use.
the categorization will happen only upon user interaction. hence I think such a control is not needed directly. Feel free to extend the current classifier to support it, the code is fairly simple..
