Ok, I created a bug entry: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7384
Cheers, Doru On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not know > but indeed it would be good to have one good one instead of three half > > Stef > > On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Does anyone know the difference between: >> - OrderedIdentityDictionary from Spec and >> - OrderPreservingDictionary from >> http://www.squeaksource.com/OrderPreservingDict >> >> ? >> >> we use the latter in XMLSupport and I think we could probably consolidate. >> >> Doru >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> ... and we need Spec as a project under team Pharo, in sthub :) >> >> On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:28 AM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Stef wrote: >>>> good idea. >>>> Do you know the test coverage of the class? >>>> Because it would be nice to run hapao on it and write some tests if there >>>> are none. >>> >>> Actually there are no tests - at least not in the Pharo image. >>> Maybe Benjamin can comment if there are some tests in the Spec universe for >>> it. >>> >>> I opened an issue: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7374 >>> >>> @Benjamin: can you move "OrderedIdentityDictionary" it out of Spec up to a >>> more general "Collection-Ordered" category/package for Pharo? >>> I dont want to interfere with current Spec development and >>> have no rights to commit to http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Spec >>> >>> BTW: Is it really necessary to have an mzc per "Collection-***" category? >>> Dont >>> know about the dependencies - but for Kernel we have only one package (and >>> one >>> for the tests). >>> >>> Thx >>> T. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
