On 2013-02-08, at 23:30, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> (regarding Mantis)
>>> 
>>> 2013/2/8 StĂ©phane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>>>> we used it for squeak and I never liked it.
>>> 
>>> It is ugly as it gets, I don't like its appearance either. I won't
>>> argue on that :)
>>> 
>>> But it is reliable, flexible and full of features.
>>> 
>> 
>> But if you look at it.. they published statistics for Squeak, and
>> it was something like 10 people used it in 12 months on 50 bugs
>> (or something like that).
>> 
>> We closed >1500 in not even 10 months… the software used as
>> a issue tracker has to be some kind of influence on that.
>> 
> 
> That's not a valid comparison.  In Squeak trunk bugs are getting fixed at a
> much higher rate than that but it isn't tracked on the issue tracker,
> because.......


> we mostly don't use an issue tracker.

sigh! which is impressive in 2013...

Reply via email to