Though i bet some of the 500 were closed for lack of activity rather than for resolution ;) It's not a bad thing, letting them rot has no much value and prevent progress (it's stupid to repeatedly loose time in analyzing issues that nobody cares of).
After all, what counts is that Pharo has enough task forces to throw into making a better system (simpler, less convoluted, more powerful etc...). This is a nice thing and this is what the number of closed issues reflects. Bravo Nicolas 2013/2/14 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > yeah we opened a lot. IMO, as you say, that's a good thing... you need to > break things to create new things > but there were at least 500 issues opened since the beginning of times that > we have closed in this release. > > so, 500 "historical issues"plus all the issues we created (most of them non > bugs,just modifications, enhancements, additions) > not a bad number, I think :) > > cheers, > Esteban > > On Feb 14, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You must also ask how many issues you have created since 1.4, because >> I doubt there are 1500 issues applying to 1.4. >> It's not a critic. >> It simply reflect the fact that it is necessary to temporarily break >> things in order to change underlying system (events, text, browser >> etc...) >> Especially when the system has evolved up to a point where it is >> fragile and hardly maintainable. >> >> Nicolas >> >> 2013/2/14 Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]>: >>> I was just doing some housecleaning, deleting some old bug fix images and I >>> was struck by how many important things we've accomplished. I'm still >>> dumbfounded that a community of our size has resolved 1548 issues since 1.4. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Sean >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://forum.world.st/Wow-we-ve-closed-a-lot-of-issues-tp4669901.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> > >
