Well, this is the script from hell...

newImage.sh doesn't executes the last line:

# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# try to open the image...
set -e
openImage "$PWD/$VERSION.image" "$PWD/../codegen-scripts/LoadVMMaker.st"
rm -rf "$PWD/$VERSION.image" "$PWD/$VERSION.changes";
openImage "$PWD/$generator.image" "$PWD/ImageConfiguration.st"


because openImage exits the script...

Question: can't we run all of this headless?

Phil

2013/2/16 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>:
>
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Marcus Denker wrote:
>>> On Feb 15, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Finally, with a lot of work, mana, power cards and jedi tricks, we made 
>>>> the pharo vm builds work again :)
>>>>
>>>> This builds are up-to-date with latest sources from Eliot's cog and adds 
>>>> pharo branding (AFAIK, this is the first time we are going to release 
>>>> something like that :)
>>>>
>>>> You can download it here: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/VM/job/PharoVM/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Very good!
>>>
>>> So now we need to step by step..
>>>      -> use the build in the one-click
>>>      -> link the VM zips on pharo-project.org
>>>      -> replace the VM we use for running jobs on jenkins with this.
>>>
>>> And of course:
>>>      -> test those builds on all three architectures automatically with a 
>>> test image (e.g. current 2.0 with all failing tests removed)
>>>            The idea is that this image should not change frequently (the 
>>> only variable is the VM)
>>>
>> Could the CI test new VMs against all previous "release" images eg Pharo 
>> 1.3, 1.4, 1.4 Summer, 2.0, 2.x
>> or some subset, like the last release of each major version.  While you may 
>> not want a very old release to fail a VM, at least the compatibility would 
>> be on record.
>
> One idea we had was to give up the "all VMs need to run all images", because 
> this makes it very hard to move…
>
>         Marcus
>
>
>

Reply via email to