Well, -ext and -contrib would be more in line with the practice of other projects I think (and smaller to type).
Phil 2013/2/17 Camillo Bruni <[email protected]>: > > On 2013-02-17, at 21:21, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> I would like that under the PharoTeam we only get projects that are used for >> Pharo "core" more or less. >> Then I think that it would be good to have a place to have Pharo projects >> such as XMLWriter, XMLParser, SOUP and other. >> What do you think? > > yes I would love to see them more separated > >> Do we create a new team called PharoEcosystem? > > > Then we should name the teams accordingly, I suggest three levels which are > mainly > defined by who maintains the software: > > pharo / -core => stuff that goes on http://ci.inria.fr/pharo > => 100% maintained by rmod/pharo-core team > > pharo-extension? -ecosystem? => partially maintained by rmod/pharo-core team > > > pharo-contribution => stuff that goes on > http://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution > => maintained by external people > >
