On 2013-02-25, at 14:23, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why doesn't it work in CogVM? > > because we become: methods when installing a new trailer and cog does not > support > become: on active methods. > >> Is condenseChanges ok now too? >> > I personally think we should not care. In 3.0 we really need get rid of this > overly horrible > .sources and .changes monster for something trivially simplistic. > > We saved *a lot* on our Moore's Bank account the last years… at some point it > is time > to invest that. Keep in mind that available RAM will double again until we > release 3.0… I am always impressed when I think about that :D... and even more when I see how little memory we actually use :P
