On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 February 2013 18:33, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2013/2/26 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: >>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:33 PM, "Esteban A. Maringolo" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >> >>>> If you count the number of packages in SmalltalkHub and compare them >>>> to the ones in Npmjs.org, it is impressive how much we have. >>> But isn't "package" more like "repository" on smalltalkhub? >> >> It is a Project, but on the explore screen it says Packages, so... who >> knows? :) >> >> But it is true that GitHub is to SmalltakHub what npm/gem is to...? > > No. GitHub and SmalltalkHub are repositories. Rubygems for Ruby (or > clojars for Clojure, or CPAN for Perl) - are like SqueakMap - catalogs > that point to packages/applications.
IHMO, we don't need SqueakMap anymore. If we have ConfigurationOfXXX packages for each project and a different repositories for each Pharo distribution (like the one we have already in SqueakSource), I guess we are very close to the service proposed by SqueakMap. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
