On Feb 28, 2013, at 9:29 AM, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:38 PM, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Marcus we were looking at delay and dateAndTime with igor and I wonder if 
>>> there is not a relationship 
>>> between all the date and time delays and the fact that you put the 
>>> cleanForRelease systematically for each build.
>>> 
>> 
>> yes, that could be. We can turn it off again.. and move that to 3.0
>> 
>> But we really need to have a process of building the image that does not 
>> require *anything* to be done
>> before the relase. Because anything, be it even the most trivial thing, will 
>> break if you do it only once
>> every year.
> 
> I think that it may just solve the dateAndTime delay problems 
> Now it shows that there is something wrong in the logic of the cleanup and 
> probably on the delay
> 
Ok, I added a removal for the cleanup.

> In adition there is probabbly a bug that crash the vm

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7614
        
        Marcus


Reply via email to