On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Stefan Marr <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Doru:
> 
> On 08 Mar 2013, at 06:54, Tudor Girba wrote:
> 
>> The #development version of ConfigurationOfPhexample points to a hardcoded 
>> version. Phexample is used extensively in Fame, and Fame is a Moose project, 
>> and we have the convention that the Moose projects should have the 
>> #development version point to a baseline.
>> 
>> Please add me to the project so that I can fix the configuration.
> 
> I added you.
> 
> But, please, before you fix the configuration, have a look at Stef's solution 
> to the #includesSubString: vs. #includesSubstring: issue between Pharo 1.4 
> and Pharo 2.0.
> 
> His solution is to use  Phexample-StefanMarr.67 as Pharo 2.0 implementation 
> and Phexample-StephaneDucasse.68 as Pharo 1.4 version. See [1].
> 
> I don't think this is maintainable, but did not yet get around to do it 
> properly.

just republishing 67 as 69 can also work to support development in 2.0.


> 
> Thanks
> Stefan
> 
> [1] 
> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Phexample/Phexample/diff/Phexample-StephaneDucasse.68
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stefan Marr
> Software Languages Lab
> Vrije Universiteit Brussel
> Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium
> http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr
> Phone: +32 2 629 2974
> Fax:   +32 2 629 3525
> 
> 


Reply via email to