stephane ducasse wrote:
That is why, either we explicitly put the 'Tests' group in the 'default' group,
- I would go for this behavior because I do not like implicit behavior when
this is about configuration
and I will start to write comments in all the configurations
"default is used when nothing is specified by default it will load
everything but better specify what everything is"
So once we agree I will start editing configurations like a mad.
Stef
In you book chapter about Configurations you might hint "why" it is
preferred to include Tests in default. For me...
* people fresh to the package get some examples.
* encourages new tests to be added. Having to find & load a 'Tests'
group at a later time would be an impediment to this.
You might also consider a convention for an 'Examples' group.
