On 11 March 2013 19:06, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 March 2013 17:54, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> pff... really people... i am thinking how to streamline our existing >> development process.. >> and instead i hear once again about git. > > Camillo needs to hit you around the head with a command line. You > haven't used it. You've heard several people who have used both > Monticello and git extensively say that git beats the crap out of > Monticello. Go and learn git properly. THEN come back and maybe we can > have a conversation. > I always using git from command line. And let me remind you it was me who created Cog mirrors on gitorious.. so, you shoot into the sky here. But i want more than that.. and why i happy to see that github proposes more on top, i do not really see how you can integrate that with usual workflow of smalltalk developer (means navigating/debugging living code in image).
>> okay, lets throw away MC & stuff, migrate everything on file-based >> file-per-method git repository >> and then navigate diffs on github, and trying to find senders or >> implementors of selector using web browser . > > I do believe you ought to take a moment and go read the archives. > Also, I happen to nearly violently disagree with the file-per-method > approach, but that's an entirely different kettle of fish. > > But you know what, just forget it. It's not your problem, other people > are already solving the problem, and one day hopefully you'll forget > all about this while quietly your tools happily use git under the > hood, where you neither know nor care. > I actually don't care where files stored , in what format and what service it using. I want to make my life easier integrating those services with image, so i could, without switching contexts (like between image/web browser), do my work faster and more efficient. > frank > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
