You can always have a morph that actually isn't shown.
2013/3/12 Henrik Johansen <[email protected]>:
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Tristan Bourgois wrote:
>
>> That's totally what I need! Thanks!
>>
>> But that's not strange to use Morph objects like geometric object?
>>
>> Tristan.
>
> Well, the whole point of Morphs was to be "graphical objects" (in other
> words, objects that also knew how to draw themselves/ be graphically
> manipulated).
> Having geometric objects as Morphs is merely a consequence of that philosophy.
>
> Whether you prefer a more distinct separation between a model and view of
> that model than what Morphs were built for, is another matter :)
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
