On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear Pharoers >>> >>> last january I visited another lab and I realised that the Pharo Team was >>> not good at systematically telling what we were doing. >>> I got quite frustrated by that situation, especially because we are working >>> hard to build a better system. >>> So we brainstormed when I came back and we want to apply the same ideas >>> that what we do for our research team. >>> >>> For our research team every monday we get a simple mail that tell us to say >>> to the others what we did and what we >>> plan to do. Simple, easy. >>> Then after people of the rmod team can discuss if they want more. >> >> It looks like quite an interesting idea in a research team. Do you a >> have a description somewhere how it works ? >> This is similar to a standup meeting ? > > we tried but a stand up meeting failed with us. > So we just have a mail > what you have done > what you will do
I would like to adopt such habits in my team, but standup meeting for research team is not really convenient. There is a paper where SCRUM is adapted to research team needs: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/papers/score.pdf There is a business doing something like standup meeting by email here: https://www.funscrum.com/ Apparently all the answers are summarized automatically. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
