yes, it is not so easy... and it does not worth it. Also, if you see, the removal of PackageInfo is scheduled for "june", more or less... and that's because I want all the time from now to there to remove all possible bugs in RPackage and be sure that the removal does not break the system :) anyway we have a summer release and we can include some changes (but not important ones, the idea is to include bugfixes)
Esteban On Mar 19, 2013, at 7:29 AM, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wonder.... If the March/April integrations don't break any existing API, >> and the new debugger runs in parallel with the old one, then maybe that >> might be a 2.x release, and move to 3.0 only when PackageInfo and the old >> debugger are ripped out. (of course all dependent on additional load and >> human resource availability) > > :) > > No doing a real release takes a lot of time. Now we are experimenting with > been focused and chunking actions. > There will be tons of enh and fixes that are waiting for us also and many > other actions that we do not list. > > Stef
