On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Camille Teruel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 26 mars 2013, at 08:51, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >> >> On 2013-03-26, at 08:24, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> why do we unload deprecated20 now >> >> but it was deprecated in 2.0, so you keep it in 1 version => 2.0 >> and remove it in the next version => 3.0. > > It totally agree. > However we could have cleaned the senders of those deprecated first, because > DNUs will appear eventually. normally the person who deprecates a method should fix all senders. I was so sure that this is the case that I did not even check. Marcus
