On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> mmm... the problem is that the "platform" versions are not the release, are
> nightly builds (it lacks the welcome workspace).
>
yes, we should take care… if it is for power users, it should not be on the
website.
We need to take care that the idea was not to complicate everything but to
simplify.
The whole how-we-distribute Pharo is work in Progress. It will change over the
next Months.
We should control very much the officially released image, else all the work
last monday was
for nothing.
Marcus
> Esteban
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, "Sean P. DeNigris" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> EstebanLM wrote
>>> I "backported" the 3.0 publish mechanism to Pharo 2.0.
>>> ...
>>> http://files.pharo.org/platform/
>>
>> I updated http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-2-0 to the
>> "Portable" terminology, with an updated description, and put the platform
>> versions at the top, as the first choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Cheers,
>> Sean
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://forum.world.st/Platform-and-portable-versions-for-Pharo-2-0-too-tp4678722p4678734.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
