Yes but also I do not want that people think that I want to have less Squeak on the pharo page. To me a Pharo page should be about: all the history about the squeak fork is now history for me. As a newbie I wante to get excited by pharo not understand the history of ant fighting while elephants are running around. The license story is also a pain. I would move all that into history.
Stef > You mean in the sense of the "conflict of interest" that Wikipedians > love to throw around? (Ron Teitelbaum had to deal with lots of pain > when writing up Andreas' page.) > > frank > > On 28 March 2013 12:21, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> I could but I do not want people bash me if I focus on Pharo on that page. >> >> Stef >> >> On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> have you seen it? >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo >>> >>> it is old, small, non-accurate and well... it could receive a lot of love :) >>> (the weird thing is that the image is actually a 2.0 image, he) >>> >>> Can anyone adopt the page and update it? >>> >>> thanks, >>> Esteban >>> >>> ps: also... we have a lot of spanish speakers in this list (including >>> myself). It is a shame that we do not have a spanish version :) >> >> >
