I also worked with Envy for more than 10 years and after getting used to it (which took a certain time), it was the stable base for my daily work. Now I am learning to work with metacello/monticello. I find myself regularly thinking "hm, in Envy it was ...".
I think that taking some of the principles of Envy would make sense. Sabine Von meinem iPad gesendet Am 07.04.2013 um 10:12 schrieb Marten Feldtmann <mar...@schrievkrom.de>: > Alexandre, > > I had the same feeling, when I had to use it starting around 1997 in our > company :-) > > We are now C#'pers, but it is interesting to see, that one item is remembered > by all persons in our team from the Smalltalk-epoche in our company in a > friendly way: ENVY. > > This was the item, which seem to impressed most of the people - especially > *after* switching to VS. > > Marten > > On 07.04.2013 04:48, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> Hi Marten, >> >> Frankly speaking, I find Envy way too complicated. I am using it these days >> and I am really not happy with. If I have to read a book to understand how >> it works, than there is no way I can teach students on how to use it in a >> reasonable amount of time. >> Configuration Map, Application, edition, scratch version and many more are >> way too many concepts, in my opinion. > <marten.vcf>
