skrish

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be>wrote:

> I can add you to the repo on STH. What's your user?
>
>
> 2013/4/9 S Krish <krishnamachari.sudha...@gmail.com>
>
>> *LoggingEvent* >>
>>
>> *printBasicsOn: aStream
>>     aStream nextPutAll: LoggingEvent timestampClass now asString;
>>         nextPutAll: '   ';
>>         nextPutAll: self levelString;
>>          nextPutAll: ' - ';
>>          nextPutAll: self messageString*
>>
>> I will like to see the timestamp printed out akin to the log4j output..
>>
>> Also I had added a Logger class that will allow* multi channel logging*of 
>> the same log outputs: transcript, stream , file , socket, based on
>> adding to a loggerCollection class instance variable.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> No, it didn't. There are missing selectors for DateAndTime and the tests
>>> aren't right in the first place.
>>>
>>> No, didn't change SqueakSource. Anyone is welcome to do so.
>>>
>>> Also, some FileSystem changes have to occur.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/9 Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> philippeback wrote
>>>> > I've taken the Toothpick source (as mentioned in the Collaboractive
>>>> book)
>>>> > and put the packages in Smalltalk Hub.
>>>> >
>>>> > There were some things with trimming blanks which I fixed.
>>>> >
>>>> > Now, some tests aren't right (but because they use dates from 2006
>>>> and we
>>>> > are in 2013)
>>>> >
>>>> > If someone could look in there, it would be nice.
>>>> >
>>>> > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Toothpick
>>>> >
>>>> > Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So just changing from 2006 to 2013 made the tests pass?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for moving the repo.  Did you edit the Squeaksource page to
>>>> point at
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://forum.world.st/Toothpick-tp4680310p4680345.html
>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to