On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goub...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Le 11/04/2013 17:41, Benjamin a écrit : >> Most probably yes :) > > Ok then, I'll do something like : not allow rename on a MC Package, allow > rename on a RPackage. I don't know what renaming a Monticello package is > really doing, regarding things like the package history… yes it is probably totally broken. > >> Did I implemented myself or is this part of the refactoring engine ? > > It links directly to RPackageOrganizer without dependencies on the > refactoring engine, so it's probably you :) There is a method which may be of > interest to note, which is isValidPackageName:; why not moving it to RPackage > so that we keep a bit of self-documenting validation there? > > Thierry > > >> Ben >> >> On Apr 11, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goub...@cea.fr >> <mailto:thierry.goub...@cea.fr>> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to rename packages, so I'm adding the command to AltBrowser >>> using the Nautilus renamePackage as the way to do it. But looking at >>> the code, I wonder : does this really work ? >>> >>> If I select a subcategory of my Monticello package, it looks like it >>> will work (call RPackageOrganizer>>renamePackage:in:). But, if I >>> select my Monticello package itself (the one with the curly M ico) >>> then it seems it will rename just the RPackage and not much else (i.e. >>> for example, if I rename AST-Core, AST-Core-Matching, AST-Core-Nodes, >>> etc... will stay unchanged). Did I got that right ? >>> >>> Thierry >>> -- >>> Thierry Goubier >>> CEA list >>> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués >>> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >>> France >>> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >>> >> > > > -- > Thierry Goubier > CEA list > Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués > 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex > France > Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >
