On 12 April 2013 23:20, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > funny, I wanted to look at it in my actual 2.0 working image and I don't have > a single occurrence of it. It is a 2.0 image? > 3.0 latest..
it looks like it depends on something .. (like the way you look, and what you ate today on breakfast ;) > Norbert > > Am 12.04.2013 um 23:08 schrieb Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com>: > >> I tried to find the cause but failed... >> >> this thing is annoying.. >> >> lets look at the code and brainstorm, about: >> 1) what happening >> 2) how we can fix it >> >> because i am out of ideas.. >> and having this crap replicating itself in our images is not tolerable. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> <Screen Shot 2013-04-12 at 11.05.49 PM.png> > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
