Camillo Bruni-3 wrote > I liked ruby-gems approach more than the one in Metacello. You usually > specify > a major version (as under linux) for your dependency.
It seems they're using semantic versioning, which is *awesome*, but can we depend on the convention being followed? I've been pushing to get the tools (e.g. Versionner) to use semantic version numbers by default (i.e. new bugfix version, new enhancement version, new incompatible version) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-configuration-conventions-tp4681777p4682036.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
