Am 18.04.2013 um 23:13 schrieb Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com>: > On 18 April 2013 23:02, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> >> >> Am 18.04.2013 um 22:15 schrieb "Sean P. DeNigris" <s...@clipperadams.com>: >> >>> I tweaked the code because in my most common case, I don't care that it's >>> e.g. aByteString, but only that it's aString: >>> >>> (argument isKindOf: String) ifTrue: [ ^ 'aString' ]. >>> (argument isKindOf: Collection) ifTrue: [ ^ 'aCollection' ]. >>> (argument isKindOf: Integer) ifTrue: [ ^ 'anInteger' ]. >>> >>> Am I the only one, or would this be useful for everyone? lmk and I'll >>> prepare a slice... >>> >> Sure, strikes me all the time! What keeps you from delegating this to the >> argument object itself. It doesn't need to be the name selector. >> > Indeed... To the hell these case statements. It should be one-liner: > > ^ argument class canonicalArgumentName > Yes. Or
^ argument class mostCommonDialectIndependentSuperClass name Well, I suck at names but you get the idea :) And demeter shall forgive me this time. Norbert
