Hi,

I tried but could not :(. I tried multiple times to load the file and go around 
the "out of memory" limitation and then at some random point, Pharo crashed. I 
was on Mac when I did the experiment. If I get more info I will let you know.

Doru


On Apr 29, 2013, at 8:44 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> wrote:

> doru can you reproduce your crash?
> Because igor asked and I did not see your answer.
> 
> Stef
> 
> On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing 
>> with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB  or about 15 million lines of 
>> text.
>> 
>> I opened the file in several other editors:
>> - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly
>> - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly
>> - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless)
>> 
>> How did Rubric perform:
>> - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly
>> - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :(
>> 
>> In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than 
>> TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. 
>> 
>> If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I 
>> used:
>> 
>> ---
>> Gofer new 
>>      smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric';
>>      package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26';
>>      load.
>> 
>> [
>>      contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' 
>> / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents).
>>       (RubLipsumBasicExample 
>>              windowWithScrolledText: (
>>              RubLipsumBasicExample new
>>                      string: contents; 
>>                      newScrolledTextNotWrapped))
>>                      openInWorld
>>       ] timeToRun 
>> ---
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> 
>> "What we can governs what we wish."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."




Reply via email to