yes! Now I would love to have time doing something instead of talking (nothing against you - now I can print here ----)
Stef On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > Maybe > Collections-Kernel > i.e. not Collection, but Collections > ? > > On 27 August 2010 16:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys >> >> I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635 >> which I split into >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875 >> >> Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package" >> >> Tests-ToolBuilder >> -> ToolBuilder-Test >> >> Now in addition I would like to have >> >> Kernel >> the right stuff there >> >> Collection-Kernel >> Containing what is needed for the core >> I prefer that to Kernel-Collection >> since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in >> Collection >> but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel >> Now for Array we will have >> >> Array will be in >> Collection-Kernel >> Collection-Kernel-Test >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users _______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
