Have you tried the matrix implementation in the numerical package from Didier H. Besset?
http://squeaksource.com/@Q45T_l348Ag07gGT/VMsGzidC ----------------- Benoit St-Jean A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero. (Albert Einstein) > Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:33:17 -0300 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pharo-users] Fastest matrix implementation? > > Hi list > > In the context of a scientific project here we are building big > matrices for later processing, mostly exporting to custom file formats > for PLINK, HaploView, etc (bioinformatics tools). I've tested one of > our scripts in both Pharo 1.1 (not CogVM) with the corresponding > Python 2.6 implementation (without PyPy), and the performance in > Python was superior, about 8x faster than ST. > So I wonder if anyone knows the fastest (or a faster) implementation > of Matrix than the included by default in Collections? > > Cheers, > > -- > Hernán Morales > Information Technology Manager, > Institute of Veterinary Genetics. > National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). > La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina. > Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799. > Internal: 422 > Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799. >
