excellent! Nick did you sign the license agreement.
Stef On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Nick Chen wrote: > > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>>> >>> Thanks Stef and Ben. I did get it to work with the latest Pharo-1.3 core. >>> It >>> has >>> a clean interface that I look forward to using it when it becomes >>> official. >>> >>> I am not familiar enough with the Pharo Core -> Pharo Dev process so I >>> was >>> not able to get the Mercury Panel (if it works in Nautilus), the >>> refactoring >>> tools and navigation history to work. >> >> it does not. >> Ben will add refactoring support soon (matter of menus), navigation and >> search. >> > > OK. I'll keep an eye on Nautilus. It is always nice to see changes being > made to > the browser to make it more the UI more functional and up-to-date. > > > >>> Actually, the project that I'm currently on also makes uses of some of >>> the >>> underlying components in Pharo-1.2 like Morphs and Editors so I can't >>> really >>> use the bleeding edge in Pharo-1.3. But I would like to use it soon. So >>> some >>> questions for you as core developers: >>> >>> 1) Do you have a API for Pharo-1.2? I know that you can do WorldMenu > >>> Help >>> and browse to Pharo > API Reference but there is nothing official there >>> stating that those are the "official" APIs. >> >> not that I know :) >> >>> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >>> start porting what we to make sure that it works. >> >> 1.3 is stable, really stable. >> > > I'll post on the mailing list if I have specific questions about the > components > that I'm using. > > > >>> Anyway back to O2. I'm in the process of getting the O2 packages to work. >>> I've >>> gotten them to load for the most part and from my own use they seem to >>> work. >>> I'll try to make the remaining failing/error tests pass and then post my >>> initial changes. I already know that some things don't work like >>> undo/redo but I (or >>> someone else) can fix those later. >> >> I would not invest on O2. This is the past and it bends too much OB so >> have a >> look at nautilus the groups are working much better. >> >> Stef >> >> > > Agreed. I've invested just a few hours already so I decided to just finish > it > up. I've made the proposed fix available at > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3992. Perhaps some other > people > might find it useful. Perhaps not, but that's OK too. :-) > > -- > Nick > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Code-Navigation-Navigation-History-in-System-Browser-tp3438888p3443762.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
