On 02 May 2011, at 00:09, Andy Burnett wrote: > I haven't used stunnel before. I doesn't look too difficult to install, but > when you say 'workaround' is it simply a case of install it, and then use it > with Pharo. Or, do I have to make changes to Pharo to get it to take > advantage of stunnel?
Here is a good description: http://blog.doit.st/2011/02/23/cloudforksso-on-pharo-with-stunnel/ No, it does require changing the Smalltalk side, I call it a workaround because really supporting HTTPS out of the box would be much better. However, I must say that I did not get it to work on Mac OS X (almost ;-), then I switched to a my virtual Ubuntu GNU/Linux and it worked. Sven
