On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:30 AM, laurent laffont wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Miguel Moquillon 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 13/06/2011 17:57, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
> 
> 
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote:
> 
> Ok,
> 
> I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions.
> (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.)
> 
> so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit show 
> up.
> I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do what 
> we want.
> Thus I have two possible solutions:
> - provide a direct contribution to the SUnit project with my code,
> - or fork SUnit to a new project (PharoUnit?) so that anybody can enhance the 
> unit test framework for Pharo.
> 
> In fact, I don't know if the Pragma implementation in Pharo is specific to 
> the Squeak/Pharo smalltalk dialect. In that case, I think it would be better 
> to fork SUnit as my changes will be based upon pragmas.
> 
> 
> Indeed http://squeaksource.com/SUnit is global Read / Write, creator/admin = 
> Marcus Denker, so I suppose you can submit a package/branch in this repo 
> safely.
> 
But keep in mind that the SUnit from Pharo is not regularly saved there... 
maybe it should? But than, without automatisation this is too much work.



--
Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.


Reply via email to