On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Simon Denier <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On 28 juil. 2011, at 22:33, laurent laffont wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Simon Denier <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> About the Pharo IDE task force, I think it would be cool if either Laurent
>> in Annecy or Doru in Bern could organize a Dojo over a week-end.
>>
>>
> Over a week-end will be hard for me (wife, children :) but on a Saturday or
> Sunday it can be possible (Annecy is easier for me).
>
>
>
> It's a bit too late but what do you do this week-end? :) Weather does not
> seem so nice in the mountains.
>


I'm still not back in Annecy.  But I'm still on vacation next week and in
Annecy, so there may be some time for a try ?

For those interested, Tuesday (August, 2)  there will be a SmallHarbour
sprint with Romain in Annecy.

Laurent.



>
>
>
> With Skype and TeamViewer we should be able to work together (more than 2)
> on a single computer, pair program over the web. Do you want to try this ?
>
> Laurent.
>
>
>
>>
>> On 1 juil. 2011, at 10:40, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>> > Dear Pharoers
>> >
>> > I think that we are doing a great work: when I look at the work on the
>> theme, better widgets, network.....Excellent! and thanks.
>> > Now we were discussing with Doru about how we as community could
>> coordinate and structure ourselves better to create more energy.
>> >
>> > Analysis of the current situation:
>> >       Right now we have individuals doing great projects, sometimes we
>> have a group of people but this is often not visible.
>> >       Now often happens a bit in ad-hoc way. Because someone ask
>> something, then somebody replies and we integrate the replies.
>> >
>> > What I would like to see emerging are First Class Tasks with
>> >       a name
>> >       a topic
>> >       a coordinator
>> >       a group of interested participants,
>> >       a set of identified clients (because clients are the ones that
>> often make us deliver more),
>> >       a little agenda,
>> >       a web presence on the web page
>> >
>> >
>> > If we look at what we have right now that are potential Tasks and really
>> important clients
>> >
>> >       - The Z connection:
>> >               Network/Socket
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Sven
>> >               Socket: Noury Luc Jannik Olivier
>> >               Clients: Seasiders, Clouders,
>> >
>> >       - Morphic 2:
>> >               UI: Alain Gary Igor
>> >               Coordinator (proposed): ?
>> >                       Presenty framework
>> >                       VoidNullPointer UIBuilder
>> >                       Athens
>> >               Clients: Moose, Pharo IDE
>> >
>> >       - Pharo IDE:
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Doru
>> >               work around TWM Laurent
>> >               Nautilus: Benjamin Laurent
>> >               Glamourous: Doru Damien
>> >
>> >       - OPAL:
>> >               Compiler tool chain
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Marcus?
>> >                Jb, Jorge, Marcus,
>> >                       Helvetia lukas
>> >                       Niko Schwarz?
>> >
>> >       - Package:
>> >               Stef, Cyrille
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Stephane
>> >               Client: Nautilus, Doru Moose,
>> >
>> >       - Metacello
>> >               Dale Mariano
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Dale?
>> >               Client: Stef with the idea of distribution, Torsten don't
>> you want to help here?
>> >
>> >       - Coral:
>> >               Coordinator (proposed):  Damien?
>> >               Damien, Luc, Adrien, Stef,
>> >               Client: Damien, Olivier?
>> >
>> > So what would be good is to have the identification on the web site of
>> these groups.
>> > More discussions and concentration with a set of little tasks to be
>> performed
>> > We could tag the mails with [Task-UI], [Task-OPAL], have a little
>> visible agenda.
>> >
>> > What do you think? I think that it is important.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Stef
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Simon Denier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> Simon Denier
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to