> >> >>> I read at the Seaside list: "There are no plans in supporting OB in Pharo >>> 1.4." >> >> So :) should we do it? This is the question? Should we maintain a system >> that the maintainers do not work >> to maintain on Pharo1.4? and for which we have no control? This is a real >> question :) >> > > Haha, too much internals the humble user doesn't know about :) > So, OB is not developed by the same people than Pharo-Project and the people > responsible for OB won't support Pharo 1.4? So it's no longer there.
I think so. And this is not under our control. >> >> - People may want to use Nautilus that is build on this core. >> > > Of course, i already gave it a try and made a nice drawing with suggestions: > http://forum.world.st/more-Nautilus-feed-back-tp4457416p4459175.html > I'm looking forward to use it in the future! > > The question was really about *getting information* on what is happening. It > is not always clear to the uninitiated. ask and we will tell. You can also read the document I spent days to write and that we sent around about Pharo vision. Stef > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Status-of-OmniBrowser-OBSystemBrowser-in-1-4-tp4508367p4508499.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
