On 29 May 2012, at 18:05, Volkert Barr wrote: > No effect.
But this is more complicated: OK, the method was removed, code completion shows the method based on the fact that the symbol exists. Now, compacting the table could remove the symbol, or not, maybe it is still used somewhere else (recent changes, changesets, monticello, …). IMHO, this feels like interfering with GC. Completions is a hard problem: it would be dead slow if it was 100% accurate. Sven
