On Jun 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: > Hi > > Would it be a nuisance for a file such as > > Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick.zip > > to include an empty text file named > > 14438 > > or to add that id to the readme along with date (preferably the former > - but since the date is being written there anyway ... ) > > I no longer have the DASD on this laptop to keep all of these zip's, > but at the same time like our clean install using just 'Pharo-1.4' > directory naming. > > Comparing the dates in README.txt seems silly when the zip already > carries an id. > > Just one of those little things that makes morning coffee more > enjoyable ... (one less needless vexation)
Yes, we should do that. Can you add a ticket in the issue tracker? -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
