Thanks for updating this, phil!
philippeback wrote > I was educating myself on slices. Maybe I'll be able to contribute a > bit properly one of these days. It's actually sooo easy now... much has been streamlined... philippeback wrote > All right, I can understand but this feels like unnatural to be on a > repository and ask to "Add to package..." where what I want to do is > to add the package to the repository. I agree that this part of the UI is counter-intuitive, but the good news is, you don't have to do this step for slices anymore. The inbox is added automatically. philippeback wrote > Select your package-cache repository on the right hand pane. This step is no longer necessary. philippeback wrote > You will be prompted for a log message (for each one of them ?) There's just one commit message for the whole slice. philippeback wrote > Make sure to give the number of the issue your SLICE addresses in the > comment. Interesting. I never do that. Why is it necessary? philippeback wrote > Right click the repository and select "Add to package..." (this will > associate the package to the repository). Again, not necessary. Also, why save to the package cache first? I always save directly to the inbox and I'm pretty sure is automatically saves to the cache as well... Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slices-and-monticello-add-to-package-or-add-package-to-procedure-tp4670639p4670809.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
