On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Paul Davidowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> To Camillo Bruni:
> I'm not using any slot image (I only looked over the paper). According
> to the Pharo book, 'pvt' should be implemented in the mainstream image.
>
The Pharo book is about a version of Pharo from many years ago.
> To Marcus Denker:
> There are actually several methods in the image with the 'pvt' prefix.
> Please update the doc (Pharo book) to remove talking about 'pvt'. It
> would have saved me a little headache :)
>
The pharo book is very old… yes, we need to update it. What should I not
do to have time for that?
Marcus
