Hi Milan, On 07 Apr 2013, at 08:43, Milan Mimica <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 15:24, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here in Pharo headquarters we are shock that there are just 10 new bugs > reported for 2.0 after the release... > So... I wonder... is that because we made a really cool release, or just > because nobody is using it? > > I know you must be starving for feedback on Pharo 2.0, so here is mine. > > I ported my app to it, from Pharo 1.4. The app uses Glorp, Seaside, RFB and > HPDF, so it took me an afternoon. > The overall impression is great. Unlike 1.4, it didn't crash a single time. > Another great thing is that you didn't make that many backward incompatible > changes as I though you would. Of course, I had to patch almost all of the > above (their dependencies include FFI, OpenDBX etc.) and rewrite some little > bits of my code, but it was worth it. The new FS classes are must better. > From user's point of view there is no much difference to 1.4, which is a good > thing. I know you revamped things internally. > > Keep the good work, and I hope I will be able to provide you with feedback > from real production environment soon. That is really great to hear. Thanks! Sounds like an impressive application that you got there. We value success stories and/or great use cases a lot, when you are ready. Sven > -- > Milan Mimica > http://sparklet.sf.net -- Sven Van Caekenberghe Proudly supporting Pharo http://pharo.org http://association.pharo.org http://consortium.pharo.org
