On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:47 AM, José Comesaña <jose.comes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the
> corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made it
> bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but...
>
> If you tell me how, I will do it again.
>
What we could do now is to merge you issue into the 11222 (it has a long
discussion already). And then you can commit your code as a Slice for 11222 for
the others there to
check.
Marcus
> Regards
>
>
> 2013/7/29 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34 PM, José Comesaña <jose.comes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It was already discussed and modified:
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869
> >
>
> This one is just an open report… no action was done. I have merged it into
> Issue 11222
>
> But there is a third issue about exactly the same, this I think is from you:
>
> 10870 Corrections to Date class >>readFrom:pattern:
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10870
>
>
> > Regards
> >
> > 2013/7/24 Sabine Knöfel <sabine.knoe...@gmail.com>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy'
> >
> > Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013
> >
> > The comment is saying
> > "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000"
> >
> > So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug?
> >
> > Sabine
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427.html
> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
>
