I think that indeed you touch on 2 important cultural issues, first the entire "Worse is Better" discussion (started by Richard Gabriel), and second that IDE support is key for getting more advanced forms of modularity in use. In my experience, sadly, Traits support in Pharo has been less than ideal. In 2.0 it has improved though, so I am happy about that.
On Aug 22, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kube...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting. Is it only problem of system complexity? I have the impression > the problem is that people do not changed his mind in order to think in > traits. (or generally speaking in any other system like mixins, aspects, > etc.) It looks like objects with single-inheritance are simple and powerful > enough. > > Or maybe any system like traits have not come with efficient enough IDE? ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
