+1
Pharo should be Pharo :)
And we should all push in that direction
- minimal core
- sweet integration with the rest of the world
- objects
- cool libraries
> I think that we should be passionate about what we are doing. Look at Scala
> for example. It’s becoming quite popular, and it was developed for 10 years.
> Pharo still has a lot of time to attract people, but we need to push
> something new. It’s not java like smalltalk, or something smalltalk-inspired
> that looks like C. For me Pharo is what had to happen to Smalltalk:
> evolution. Usually Smalltalk is mentioned with “80” suffix. Pharo is
> Smalltalk2013. And we can make it really cool, but we should stick to
> smalltalk philosophy. Having tools, working with objects, etc...
