Thanks, i checked that out from some digging. Actually all my protocol run over TCP/IP so i cannot do most, but im taking in care move to UDP or maybe one of the Real time options. Thanks!
2013/11/20 Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> > If your sockets are connection oriented (it is. TCP) using IP > Multicast won't be an option. > > Multicast was made with Datagrams in mind instead of Packets. Though > there was a multicast solution that numbered the datagrams to request > retransmission in case of packet loss. > > Regards, > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2013/11/20 Santiago Bragagnolo <[email protected]>: > > Great info! Thanks! > > > > > > 2013/11/20 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> > >> > >> Dig deeper: IP protocol supports broadcasting/multicasting. > >> > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_multicast > >> > >> > >> On 20 November 2013 08:49, Santiago Bragagnolo > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all! Im making some performance enhancement on PhaROS, i realised > that > >>> one of my common scenarios is having several sockets that should > receive > >>> exactly the same information, in order to do that, im using n calls to > the > >>> vm, which does n system-calls. > >>> > >>> I was wondering if there something done in: > >>> > >>> - send the same data to all the sockets in just one primitive > >>> - send the same data to all the sockets in just one syscall. > >>> > >>> I checked around in google but i didn't found anything useful, but > >>> probably i have no knowledge about the proper words for such search :). > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Igor Stasenko. > > > > > >
